rolling out Project 2025

The Liar-In-Chief can deny all he wants but actions show otherwise:

From Forbes:

Here’s How Trump’s Executive Orders Align With Project 2025—As Author Hails President’s Agenda As ‘Beyond My Wildest Dreams’

Alison Durkee
Forbes Staff
Alison is a senior news reporter covering US politics and legal news.

Paul Dans, the former leader of hard-right policy agenda Project 2025, cheered President Donald Trump’s agenda as being “beyond my wildest dreams” in an interview with Politico, as the president’s first months in office have featured a slew of executive orders that reflect proposals outlined in the policy blueprint, even as Trump has long tried to distance himself from it.

Donald Trump Delivers State of the Union address to Congress
President Donald Trump holds a copy of an executive order as he addresses a joint session of … [+]Getty Images

Key Facts

Project 2025 includes a 900-page report proposing a total overhaul of the executive branch, which was crafted by the Heritage Foundation and other conservative groups in 2023 as a roadmap for the next conservative president—namely Trump—to follow.

Trump has repeatedly denied having any involvement with Project 2025, after Democrats highlighted it as a key reason to vote against Trump in the election, and while there’s no evidence he’s explicitly following its proposals or has any plan to, many of the steps he’s taken since his inauguration are in line with suggestions made in the policy blueprint.

DEI: Trump has taken significant efforts to dismantle diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives throughout the government—and in the private sector—since taking office, signing multiple executive orders aimed at abolishing those programs, which mirrors Project 2025’s calls for the next conservative president to “eliminate every one of [the Biden administration’s] wrongful and burdensome ideological projects,” writing, “Nondiscrimination and equality are the law; DEI is not.”

Among the “DEI” policies Trump revoked is a 60-year old policy from 1965 that prohibited employment discrimination by government contractors and empowers the federal government to impose consequences for any discriminatory practices, which Project 2025 explicitly called to revoke, writing that abolishing the Lyndon B. Johnson-era executive order would mean contractors will “be less subject to the changing political whims of a President that might impose significant new costs or burdens.”

Border Security and Defense: Project 2025 is largely in line with Trump’s broad moves to restrict immigration and tighten security on the southern border, with both the president and Project 2025 advocating increasing detention facilities for undocumented migrants, taking steps that would give local law enforcement more jurisdiction over identifying undocumented migrants, rescinding Biden-era immigration policies, restricting undocumented immigrants’ abilities to receive public funds and restricting parole programs for migrants, among other moves.

Federal Spending: The Trump administration’s recent decision to broadly halt federal assistance, which it later walked back, echoes Project 2025’s call for the president to “use every possible tool to propose and impose fiscal discipline on the federal government,” saying, “Anything short of that would constitute abject failure”—a passage written by Vought, whom Trump tapped to lead the Office of Management and Budget, which issued the funding pause memo.

The Trump administration and Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency have more broadly aimed to cut spending throughout the federal government beyond its outside assistance, after Project 2025 claimed, “Unaccountable federal spending is the secret lifeblood of the Great Awokening,” alleging federal funds are used for “nearly every power center held by the Left.”

Federal Workforce: The Trump administration has made substantial job cuts throughout the federal workforce through buyouts and mass firings, after Project 2025 advocated for a dramatically reduced federal government, arguing, “the surest way to put the federal government back to work for the American people is to reduce its size and scope back to something resembling the original constitutional intent.”

As part of its proposals for the federal workforce, Project 2025 strongly advocates for replacing career civil servants with political appointees dedicated to the president’s agenda, and Trump has taken multiple steps toward that goal already, including reimplementing a “Schedule F” order that makes it easier to fire career officials, imposing a hiring freeze for career civil servants and restricting collective bargaining agreements for unionized workers—all of which Project 2025 suggested.

Blocking Biden Funds: Trump’s move to block government agencies from spending funds appropriated through Biden-era infrastructure and inflation bills is reflected in Project 2025, which said those laws should be repealed and it “support[s] the rescinding of all funds not already spent by these programs.”

Education: Trump is reportedly planning to abolish the Department of Education, with newly-confirmed Secretary of Education Linda McMahon telling staff the agency is undertaking a “historic final mission”—though he couldn’t get rid of it unilaterally without Congress—after Project 2025 proposed getting rid of the agency, arguing, “The future of education freedom and reform in the states is bright and will shine brighter when regulations and red tape from Washington are eliminated.”

Trump has also signed executive orders restricting funding for K-12 schools that “indoctrinate” students based on “gender ideology and discriminatory equity ideology,” reflecting views espoused in Project 2025—though that proposal doesn’t call for restricting funding—and an order for agencies to investigate how to implement policies that expand “school choice,” after Project 2025 called for the government to use federal funding to “[empower] families to choose among a diverse set of education options.”

NOAA: One of Project 2025’s proposals that gained widespread attention was that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA—which handles weather monitoring, among other functions—should be dismantled and the National Weather Service should commercialize its weather forecasting, and while the Trump administration has not yet gone that far, it has reportedly fired hundreds of NOAA staffers and canceled leases at some weather forecasting centers, sparking fears that the cuts could affect preparedness and responses to future storms.

Climate Change: Project 2025 proposed leaving the Paris Climate Agreement, which Trump did on his first day in office, and the president’s broad proposals to roll back climate change policies is in line with Project 2025, which denounced the Biden administration’s “radical climate agenda” and called for climate change efforts to be removed from governmental efforts like providing foreign aid and regulating agriculture.

Energy: Trump declared a “national energy emergency” and broadly took action against efforts on renewable energy, like the Biden administration’’s pro-electric vehicle policies and federal wind energy projects—saying the U.S. should instead increase energy production through oil and gas drilling—after Project 2025 similarly claimed the U.S.’ “energy crisis is caused … by extreme ‘green’ policies” and said the next president “must be committed to unleashing all of America’s energy resources.”

Trump also created a “National Energy Dominance Council” in order to “to make America energy dominant,” after Project 2025 urged the next administration to “prioritize energy and science dominance.”

Abortion: Though Trump has not taken broad steps to restrict abortion, as Project 2025 advocates, he did issue an executive order undoing Biden-era policies that weakened the Hyde Amendment, which prevents federal dollars from being used on abortion, as Project 2025 advocated for, and reinstated the “Mexico City Policy” that prohibits non-governmental organizations receiving federal funds from performing or promoting abortion.

Foreign Policy: Trump signed an executive order calling for the secretary of state to put the agency’s operations “in line with an America First foreign policy,” echoing Project 2025’s calls for the State Department to “ensur[e] that the interests of American citizens are given priority,” and signed another order threatening punishments if State officials don’t “faithfully implement the President’s policy,” after Project 2025 called for the next administration to eliminate the “tug of war” between the president and career officials and overhaul the agency “into a lean and functional diplomatic machine that serves the President.”

Trump’s executive order to sanction countries that refuse to go along with his hardline immigration policies—which led to a trade standoff with Colombia over whether the country would accept deported migrants—also reflects Project 2025, which says the executive branch should “quickly and aggressively address recalcitrant countries’ failure to accept deportees by imposing stiff sanctions until deportees are in fact accepted for return (not just promised to be taken).”

World Health Organization: Project 2025 denounced the World Health Organization before Trump signed an executive order withdrawing the U.S. from the public health institution, with Project 2025 authors claiming the WHO’s “manifest failure and corruption … during the COVID-19 pandemic” posed “danger … to U.S. citizens and interests,” and the U.S. “must be prepared to take appropriate steps in response” to any international organizations that purportedly threaten its interests, “up to and including withdrawal.”

Global Organizations: Project 2025 broadly said the next administration “must end blind support for international organizations” and “seriously consider” withdrawing from groups “that no longer have value, quietly undermine U.S. interests or goals, or disproportionately rely on U.S. financial contributions to survive”—foreshadowing Trump’s executive order to remove the U.S. from the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), stop providing funding to the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) and review the U.S.’s involvement in the U.N. Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

Transgender Rights: Trump’s moves against transgender rights include ordering the government to only recognize Americans’ sex at birth, banning federal prisons from classifying inmates based on their gender identity, reinstating his ban on transgender Americans from serving in the military and restricting gender-affirming care for minors, after Project 2025 broadly called for gender ideology and identity to be removed from government policies and for the transgender military ban to be reinstated.

Trump also signed an order rescinding federal funding from school programs that allow transgender women to participate in women’s sports, after Project 2025 decried the federal government “forc[ing] school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists.”

Refugees: Trump suspended refugee admissions in an executive order on his first day, after Project 2025 said the “federal government’s obligation to shift … essential screening and vetting resources to the forged border crisis will necessitate an indefinite curtailment of the number of USRAP refugee admissions.”

Sanctuary Cities: Trump signed multiple executive orders saying the government should try to block “sanctuary cities” or areas that offer greater protections to undocumented immigrants from receiving federal funding, after Project 2025 said Congress should “set financial disincentives” for areas that implement “sanctuary” policies.

Death Penalty: Trump directed his attorney general to pursue the death penalty where applicable—as in Project 2025, which says the federal government should “enforce the death penalty where appropriate and applicable”—and actually went even further than Project 2025, saying the death penalty should be imposed in crimes involving the murder of law enforcement officers and capital offenses committed by undocumented immigrants, “regardless of other factors.”

Security Clearances: Trump signed an executive order giving security clearances to any individual designated by the White House counsel to receive one, rather than waiting for the full background check process to be completed, with Project 2025 also decrying the “extraordinary delays” caused by the clearance process.

Project 2025 also backed up Trump’s decision to revoke many former government officials’ security clearances, saying the next president “should immediately revoke the security clearances of any former … senior intelligence officials who discuss their work in the press or on social media” without prior authorization.

FEMA: Project 2025 proposed the Federal Emergency Management Agency should be moved to the Department of the Interior and reformed—which Trump suggested he may do, saying he will sign an order to “begin the process of fundamentally reforming and overhauling FEMA, or maybe getting rid of them,” while his administration has also cut jobs at the disaster relief agency.

The policy proposal also supports Trump’s suggestion he could refuse to give FEMA funds to areas that oppose him politically, with Project 2025 arguing FEMA grants should only go to areas that “can show that their mission and actions support the broader homeland security mission”—though Project 2025 specifies that wouldn’t include disaster relief funding, while Trump has suggested he could also withhold those funds.

Military Policies: Trump reinstated members of the military who were discharged for not complying with its COVID-19 vaccine mandate, as Project 2025 urged, and also signed an order ending DEI programs in the military, after Project 2025 called for the military to “eliminate Marxist indoctrination and divisive critical race theory programs and abolish newly established diversity, equity, and inclusion offices and staff.”

Federal Regulations: Trump has signed executive orders imposing a cap on federal regulations and directing agencies to identify puportedly “unlawful” regulations, after Project 2025 broadly denounced the “administrative state” and advocated for “reining in the regulatory state and ensuring that regulations achieve important benefits while imposing minimal burdens on Americans.”

IRS: The Internal Revenue Service is reportedly planning to slash half of its workforce, after already laying off approximately 7,000 workers in earlier job cuts, gutting an agency that Project 2025 referred to as “a poorly managed, utterly unresponsive and increasingly politicized agency” which requires “meaningful reform.”

Student Loans: Trump signed an order that seeks to limit the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program for public servants and has suggested he wants to abolish the Education Department and move the office that handles student loans to a different agency—echoing plans outlined in Project 2025, which calls for the Office of Student Aid to be moved to the Treasury Department and for the federal government to end all student loan forgiveness, criticizing the public service program for “prioritiz[ing] government and public sector work over private sector employment.”

Transportation Security Administration: The Department of Homeland Security ended its collective bargaining agreement with unionized TSA workers—with the union now going to court in an effort to restore the agreement—after Project 2025 suggested the TSA should be privatized entirely or a new “government corporation” should be established to run TSA outside the scope of Homeland Security.

Defense Production Act: Trump signed an executive order March 14 that revoked a number of Biden-era directives invoking the Defense Production Act—which expedites the manufacturing of various products—for infant formula and “green energy” technology like solar panels, after Project 2025 criticized overuse of the Defense Production Act and said it should only be invoked “in the gravest circumstances.”

Dans, the former president of Project 2025 who resigned before the election, praised the Trump administration’s policy moves in an interview with Politico, saying what Trump is doing in office is “actually way beyond my wildest dreams.” “What we had hoped would happen has happened,” Dans told Politico when asked if he would have handled anything differently, given the controversy Project 2025 garnered. “So I can’t imagine how anything could end really any better.”

Is Trump Following Project 2025?

While many of his policies in office line up with priorities outlined in Project 2025, Trump has publicly disavowed Project 2025 and has not changed his stance since taking office. There’s no indication he’s actually following Project 2025’s playbook now, as there’s always been significant overlap between his personal policy agenda and what Project 2025 has proposed, though Reuters reported ahead of the inauguration that the Heritage Foundation was among the groups providing draft executive orders to Trump’s transition team. Trump has not yet given any suggestion that he’s planning on imposing some of Project 2025’s more controversial sweeping measures, like abolishing the Department of Homeland Security, taking broad steps to restrict abortion or applying a baseline tax rate. Dans denied Trump was in any way working with Project 2025 or specifically following it in his interview with Politico, saying that while “directionally” Project 2025 and Trump’s agenda “have a lot in common … so do great minds.” Trump “absolutely told the truth” in distancing himself from Project 2025, Dans claimed, saying the policy project “was done outside of President Trump.”

In a statement to CNN, Trump spokesperson Harris Fields said Trump “had nothing to do with Project 2025.” “In his first few days in office, President Trump has delivered on the promises that earned him a resounding mandate from the American people – securing the border, restoring common sense, driving down inflation, and unleashing American energy,” Fields said.

How Are Trump’s Policies Different From Project 2025?

Trump’s policies since taking office also have some significant differences from what Project 2025 outlines. Most notably, one of Trump’s first acts in office was to pause the federal ban on TikTok while his administration tries to negotiate a way for parent company ByteDance to divest from it, while Project 2025 calls for banning the app. Trump’s call for mass deportations of undocumented immigrants also goes beyond what’s proposed in Project 2025, which calls for broad-scale immigration reforms and strengthened border security, but does not explicitly endorse widescale deportations. While Project 2025 proposes narrowing pathways to legal immigration and moving away from what it terms a “system that favors extended family–based and luck-of-the-draw immigration,” Project 2025 also does not call for ending birthright citizenship, as Trump has ordered. (His executive order abolishing birthright citizenship has been temporarily blocked in court.) Trump also is going further than Project 2025 on restricting foreign aid with his moves to dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development—while Project 2025 only called for “reforming” USAID and “scal[ing] back USAID’s global footprint”—and has spoke of getting rid of purported “fraud” in the Social Security Administration, which Project 2025 does not discuss. Various Trump proposals reflecting culture war issues, like making English the national language, eliminating the federal government’s use of paper straws and signing an executive order dedicated to “eradicating anti-Christian bias” are also not reflected in Project 2025.

Which Trump Cabinet Members Worked On Project 2025?

Multiple high-level officials and nominees in Trump’s second administration played a role in crafting Project 2025, including Federal Communications Commissioner Brendan Carr, senior counselor for trade and manufacturing Peter Navarro, Securities and Exchange Commission head Paul Atkins and Trump’s “border czar” Tom Homan. Carr and Navarro each authored sections of Project 2025’s policy blueprint, while Atkins and Homan are listed as contributors. Trump also nominated Aaron Szabo, a contributor to Project 2025’s section on the Environmental Protection Agency, to serve as the Assistant Administrator for the Office of Air and Radiation. Most notably, Trump nominated Vought to serve as the head of the Office of Management and Budget after Vought reportedly previously served as a key architect of Project 2025. He authored the policy proposal’s chapter on the Executive Office of the President of the United States and reportedly spearheaded the project’s playbook for Trump’s first 180 days. Vought was confirmed by the Senate in a party line 53-47 vote Feb. 6, after Democrats spoke on the Senate floor overnight in protest of his confirmation. NBC News reports the Trump transition team also used a LinkedIn-style database of federal staffers that Project 2025 compiled to help recruit lower level administration staffers.

What Have Other Trump Officials Done That Reflects Project 2025?

One of the central features of Project 2025’s policy blueprint is a heavy influence on nuclear families and supporting the nuclear family, with a goal of boosting marriage and birth rates, such as through restrictions on abortion. Vice President JD Vance, a close ally of the Heritage Foundation who has long espoused similar views about promoting marriage and birth rates, called at the anti-abortion rights March for Life rally in January for there to be “more babies in the United States of America,” arguing, “The benchmark of national success is not our GDP number or our stock market, but whether people feel that they can raise thriving and healthy families in our country.” “It is the task of our government to make it easier for young moms and dads to afford to have kids, to bring them into the world and to welcome them as the blessings that we know they are here at the March for Life,” Vance said. Trump’s Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy also issued guidance Thursday dedicated to “advancing President Donald Trump’s agenda to rescind woke policies” and “roll back burdensome and costly regulations.” That guidance includes a provision saying the department should prioritize giving grants to “communities with marriage and birth rates higher than the national average.”

What Else Does Project 2025 Say?

Project 2025 proposes a broad overhaul of the executive branch aimed at making it more aligned with conservative ideologies, and giving the president more power. In addition to proposals that would get rid of climate change efforts, rescind LGBTQ rights-centered policies, replace career civil servants with political appointees and impose an “America First” foreign policy outlook—as Trump is now to some extent adopting—the policy blueprint also makes a number of other bold policy suggestions, such as abolishing numerous government agencies, banning pornography and overhauling the Federal Reserve, proposing to do so through such measures as returning to the gold standard or getting rid of the government’s control over the U.S.’ money entirely. Project 2025 also proposes imposing a baseline tax rate—of 15% for anyone under the Social Security wage base of approximately $168,000, or 30% for those earning more than that—and lowering the corporate tax rate to 18%. It suggests making significant cuts to Medicaid and imposing work requirements to receive benefits, as well as making the paid Medicare Advantage program, which is now an alternative to regular Medicare, the default option for patients, among numerous other moves.

What To Watch For

Trump’s administration is still less than two months old, and it remains to be seen what steps he’ll take going forward that could line up—or go against—Project 2025. Trump’s Health Secretary nominee Robert F. Kennedy Jr. did not rule out at his confirmation hearing the possibility the Trump administration could revoke approvals for abortion drug mifepristone, as Project 2025 proposes, saying only that Trump “has asked me to study the safety of mifepristone” and “Whatever [Trump] does, I will implement those policies.” Trump previously told CBS News the abortion drug—which studies have overwhelmingly shown is broadly safe and effective—“is going to be available,” when asked before the election whether he would ban it, walking back his previous suggestion during an August press conference that he could be open to restricting it.

What We Don’t Know

While Project 2025 became best known for its 900-page policy blueprint, the project also included creating a playbook for Trump’s first 180 days in office. Unlike the policy blueprint, that playbook was never made public, with Vought telling journalists from the Centre for Climate Reporting—who obtained secret footage of the Project 2025 architect by posing as potential donors—that it was by design. The 180-day playbook is “very, very closely held,” Vought said in the secret footage, and Micah Meadowcroft, a Vought aide also working on Project 2025, told the undercover journalists the group was intentionally keeping the playbook a secret. Those efforts included ensuring staffers knew the plans before Trump entered office, so that they wouldn’t have to converse over government work emails that would be subject to public disclosure rules. It’s still unknown what that playbook says and whether Trump is now implementing it in office.

Key Background

Project 2025’s policy blueprint was initially released in 2023, part of what the Heritage Foundation has said is a long tradition of the organization crafting policy proposals for incoming GOP presidents that dates back to Ronald Reagan. Though the agenda had already been out for months, it only started garnering widespread attention last summer, ahead of the election, as Democrats started pushing the 900-page document and its policies as a key reason to oppose Trump, causing Trump to publicly denounce the plan. Trump claimed on Truth Social in July he has “nothing to do with [Project 2025],” has “no idea” who’s behind the plan and finds some of its ideas “absolutely ridiculous and abysmal”—even as Trump has long had significant ties to the Heritage Foundation and many of the document’s contributors worked in Trump’s first administration. The policy proposal continued to remain controversial within the Trump team through the election, with Trump’s campaign manager Chris LaCivita calling the effort a “pain in the ass” for the Trump campaign and Trump transition head Howard Lutnick—now Trump’s Commerce Secretary—publicly claiming he would blacklist people involved with Project 2025 from working in the second administration.

Thank you for reading today's post. Have an InterStellar Day! ~PrP

This entry was posted in Catastrophic Events, Legal, Politix, Society and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

40 Responses to rolling out Project 2025

  1. PrismPrincess says:

    Orti –

    When you come down pick a face I know so we can run the Facetime app on your iPhone device.

  2. Cole says:

    This blog is just too cool! I don’t care if the aliens here are real or not, the shit they talk about fascinates me and my buds. I started reading it 3 months ago, now I’m hooked. My friend here in LA, who writes screen plays for Hollywood, says he’s been feeding off it for almost a year.
    Now, if we could only get one of those three GODS or the Immortal to post. There is a movie or better yet a science fiction series in it.

    Does anyone know more about the “TWO?”

  3. Fred says:

    Nader1 have you met D]/1? I noticed that he/she didn’t answer any of the questions put to him/her, so I’m asking you.

    • Nader1 says:

      No, I have no clue if he or she either.

      • Ken says:

        Ok, you haven’t met D]/1. Have you met any aliens? And what about this Immortal? He seems to be about time, space, and distance. Those are elements that interest me, along with longevity. I’d like to live forever.

        • Ken says:

          Or longer than I do.

        • Nader1 says:

          I believe I get credit more than what I deserve.
          I’m an average person, who never met an Aliens and not interested in meeting the one who eat humans.
          I don’t know why people assuming that I know more than what I read on the Avenue.
          Not to mention my English is not all that.

          • Tina says:

            I think that your English is cute. I’d like to meet you.

            • Anonymous says:

              Just say you’d like to fuck him you slut.

              • Anonymous says:

                Loser, I may give him some good head, but I am still a virgin. No one gets this until I have a ring on my hand.

            • Nader1 says:

              Sure, If you are in Los Angeles and between 26/34 I can find a way to meet.

              • Rebi says:

                I am not in LA, but I can find a way to get there.

              • Brittany says:

                I’m 24, but I’m so fine you won’t be sorry that I’m not 26. I live in Torrance. We can meet at the Hustler Casino at 1000 W Redondo Beach Blvd, in Gardena.

                I have been working her for almost a year. I get hit on constantly, but this Catholic girl is not going to let some Sleezeball put his slimy hands on these fine thighs. I have high standards.

                Tell me what time you can make it, and I guarantee that it will be worth it.

              • Donna says:

                I’m 36, but I know how please a dick. I live in Goleta. Not too far from LA.

                I’ve been checking your posts on this blog. You seem like a man who knows his way around a good piece of pussy. You would treat a woman with a certain set of skills right.

              • Sofia says:

                I’m 5’11” tall. I weigh 121 lbs. I’m 36-24-36. I’m a natural blond(My pussy hair proves it), with distinctive green eyes. I work for AT&T in Santa Barbara. Come see me Nader1. Ginna says you are either an alien or you hang out with them.

                I used to hang out with this guy who was 6’9”, weighted 240+lbs(all muscle) and had a 9” very fat dick. He left and no body has seen him since.

                Me thinks, you are him. Come back Rai, there is so much Pussy and Head for you here. You won’t be tied down. We were always willing to share you, Miel.

                Come back where you belong!

  4. LeRoy says:

    So now we know that the Hackman’s health service, “Cloudberry Health” was responsible for their deaths. Can’t wait for the lawsuits to start. However, if I were a rich mother who used that service, I would be canceling when I heard they had been contacted by Arakawa to get an appoiment to have Gene H’s heart checked. She booked an 12Feb25 appointment date. They didn’t bother to have a wellness check when she didn’t show for the appointment.
    Gene Hackman’s Wife Called Doctor 1 Day After Her Supposed Death Date

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/gene-hackman-betsy-arakawa-death-timeline_n_67d85dece4b0dade360cfa6a

    If that doesn’t tell you this company doesn’t give a shit, then you must be one of those idiots that voted for tRump thinking he had your back.

  5. S]3 says:

    We have discovered that one of the ways the Immortal kills is by destroying the energy-producing structures within the cells of its intended target. Every organ in the bodies of the victims we have examined has been impacted.

    We haven’t selected a name for the energy-producing structures within the cells of these victims, but those structures in humans are called mitochondria. Since most of us here are familiar with the anatomy of the human and have matched similars in our own anatomies, I suggest you seriously consider that angering the creature could put every organ in your bodies in jeopardy. That would include, as it would in humans, the brain, nerves, muscles and liver.

    • G[8 says:

      Some may think that the benefit of longevity is worth the risk. LeI, need not reply as we did not say that we would be or encourage others to be of that particular logic.

    • G[8 says:

      For more that a thousand earth centuries we have been examining the dead it has left behind. For some this may explain the sudden loss of function they appeared to have lost before they expired.

      We must add this is not the only way it creates death. Its methods of delivering death vary from the quick and perhaps painless, to long slow agonizing deaths, to the making the prey aware that it is killing it and that there is nothing it can do but die when the creature tires of toying with it.

      We consider it to be the thing space travers should fear most. We also consider it to be the the thing a cognitive entity should fear most if it is discovered in its midst. This creature lives forever, it has no understanding of the value of life that those of us who don’t live forever have.

      • Jose says:

        So what you are saying is that you don’t consider it a sentient being and hence doesn’t deserve to live.

        Fuck you dude.

  6. Lawrence says:

    A family that was deported to Mexico is requesting an investigation into abuses they say they faced in U.S. detention, according to a civil rights complaint first obtained by NBC News. The mixed-immigration status family, including four U.S. citizen children, one of whom is a 10-year-old girl recovering from brain surgery, are in an area of Mexico where, they say, they fear for their safety.

    The Texas Civil Rights Project, a legal advocacy and litigation organization representing the family, filed the complaint Monday with the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties on behalf of the family.

    The complaint alleges that Customs and Border Protection, which detained and deported the family last month, committed “serious abuses” when it denied medical care to the 10-year-old girl, detained U.S. citizen children “in deplorable conditions” and removed them to Mexico, “where their lives are in peril because of their status as U.S. citizens,” among other claims.

    So you dumb fucks who voted tRump are about to find what a few more dollars in your pockets will cost. Loving every fucking minute of it.

  7. Кірілл says:

    It is rumored that the Ear gave Ukraine technology which they can use to make ammunition that burns at such a high degree that it will cause the metal on tanks to burn.

  8. Greg says:

    So you Islamic mfs who could support Harris are finding out that “elections have consequences.”

    A Cornell University graduate student filed a lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump’s executive orders aimed at going after universities and “foreign national” protesters, then he was asked to surrender to ICE.

    Momodou Taal, a Ph.D. student in Africana Studies at Cornell University, filed the suit on Saturday hoping to prevent the administration from targeting him and others who have participated in pro-Palestinian protests. An attorney for Taal said he had been targeted by some of the same groups that had advocated for Mahmoud Khalil’s arrest and that his client feared he could be next.

    Taal is a citizen of the U.K. and Gambia and is in the United States on a student visa.

    • Hank says:

      And you niggers who voted for the macho man, or the POTUS who would put a few more dollars in your pockets how about this:

      The Trump administration cut a clause from federal contracting rules that had been on the books since the 1960s: Companies are no longer explicitly prohibited f…

      https://search.app/d3Mtk68SeFSjUqYEA

      Me I can’t wait to see you niggers squirm. LOL

  9. J]7 says:

    Keep pointing out the design flaws of that Tesla truck. Telling this truth has been ruled not in violation of NIE.

  10. Holbert says:

    The British are afraid to admit that Putin was behind the London airport shut down. They have hired the Ear to get revenge.

    • Brad says:

      Almost half the Agents in the FBI are putting out feelers to the Ear about joining his organization.

  11. Misha says:

    Putin is going to claim that an Islamic country was responsible for the last year’s attack on the Moscow concert hall in which 145 people died.

    He and tRump discussed whether he could also blame a western country.

  12. Helen says:

    Did You Know
    If it feels like the number of products offered in grocery stores has skyrocketed over the course of your life, you’re not wrong. Between 1975 and 2008, products found in an average supermarket climbed from 8,948 to almost 47,000. And it keeps going up!

    • Helena says:

      Did You Know
      The idea that all vegetables are healthier when eaten raw has little basis in science. Many vegetables, such as spinach, carrots, mushrooms, peppers, and more, are significantly more nutritious when they are cooked first.

  13. Oliver says:

    I am a non citizen in the US. You motherfuckers think too much of yourselves. That “Real ID-compliant license or identification card is a piece of shit outside the US. Nobody gives bollocks about your “real id.”

    It is just another way your government has of tracking its citizens. So piss off.

  14. M]/b says:

    Here are all the ways people are disappearing from government websites:
    https://www.npr.org/2025/03/19/nx-s1-5317567/federal-websites-lgbtq-diversity-erased.

  15. Janice says:

    They helped tRump get back into the WH. The rewards have come swiftly.

    https://www.aol.com/helped-trump-back-white-house-090052077.html

    • Vance says:

      Trump is getting the IRS to share the addresses of undocumented tax payers with ICE. That breaks a long standing taxpayer privacy laws. So if you pay taxes tRump’s government agencies will be examining them.

      OH, the benefits you idiots that put that criminal into office just keep paying off. Enjoy them you ignorant pieces of shit.

  16. Foster says:

    Will Guam be America’s next Pearl Harbor?

    While much of the world is focused on Donald Trump’s selling out of Ukraine and aggressive threats toward America’s peaceful neighbors Mexico, Canada, Panama, and Greenland, if you’re in U.S. military intelligence, you’re more likely to be tracking with concern a specific Chinese threat to a piece of geography that is not in the headlines. The DF-26 intermediate-range ballistic missile represented a major upgrade of President Xi Jinping’s war-fighting toolbox when it entered service in 2016. The missile (of which about 250 have been built) is precise enough to target aircraft carriers, and it can be equipped with nuclear as well as conventional warheads. But perhaps the most striking thing about the DF-26 is its 2,500-mile range. That’s not enough to reach the continental United States, but it certainly suffices to target America’s westernmost territory in the Pacific. That’s why the DF-26 is sometimes called “the Guam killer.”

    Americans rarely spare a thought for Guam, which bills itself as the place where “America’s day begins.” Most voters in this country don’t know that the island is part of the United States, or that its 150,000 native inhabitants are U.S. citizens in every way except their right to vote in presidential elections. Even fewer would be able to find it on a map. But such ignorance doesn’t apply to our armed forces, who know the island by another nickname: “the tip of the spear.”

    Defense planners are acutely aware that any potential conflict with China will immediately involve Guam. When the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) war-gamed a Chinese invasion of Taiwan two years ago, the simulated Chinese side attacked the island’s Andersen Air Force Base “in every iteration.” The war game planners knew what they were doing. Five years ago, the People’s Liberation Army Air Force put out a video showing one of its bombers carrying out a simulated attack on Guam. The message is clear.

Comments are closed.