The sexual harasser, otherwise known as Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has been all over the news lately. I’m all for it. He and his wife need to be in jail. She’s guilty of perpetuating the lie that the election was sham and actually lobbied lawmakers to support her position. That is total inference. She still believes the lies, too.
And she got away with it. Once it was news, the story quietly went away.
The nine-member panel sought Thomas’s interview, and she appeared voluntarily. While Thomas urged Meadows to act, and she is married to one of nine Supreme Court justices who were at the time reviewing Trump’s election challenges, investigators did not believe she played a major role in Trump’s efforts to overturn the election or his inaction as the violent insurrection unfolded. Her name does not appear once in the committee’s final report released last week.
This week, it came out that Thomas sold property that he did not properly and legally disclose:
Citing state tax documents and property deeds, ProPublica reported that in 2014, one of Crow’s companies paid $133,363 for the Savannah, Georgia, home of Thomas’ mother, Leola Williams. The transaction also included two nearby vacant lots that belonged to Thomas’ family members. After the sale, Thomas’ mother continued to live in the home, which soon underwent tens of thousands of dollars in renovations.
Also, it came to light that for 20 years, has reported on required financial disclosure forms that his family received rental income totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars from a firm called Ginger, Ltd., Partnership – a Nebraska real estate firm launched in the 1980s by his wife and her relatives — has not existed since 2006. FRAUDS.
Did You Know?
The nine justices of the Supreme Court are the only federal judges not bound by the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges, which goes beyond the basic ethics laws enacted after Watergate and creates uniformity around thorny issues like recusals and participation in political activities. … The Supreme Court is by far the least democratic branch of government. The policymakers in every other branch are regularly accountable to the public in elections. But not the justices. Life-time appointments make them essentially immune from any kind of public accountability.
You read that right. It’s essentially a dictatorship. The Court itself, could not come to agreement on implementing a code of conduct. That screams, volumes! CROOKS.
On April 7, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., who chairs the Senate Judiciary Courts Subcommittee, tweeted, “As long as 9 justices are exempt from any process for enforcing basic ethics, public faith in SCOTUS will continue to decline.”
T*/7^, that’s disturbing. I am very sorry to hear of it. Hopefully you’ve now fixed the osilator?
Doug, sticking your tongue out is different than actually kissing someone, then asking them to suck your tongue. But, I do appreciate your post, it is leading me to open up the comment tree. More needed to be said here, imo. Let’s see how well it works, everyone.
Thank you for reading today's post. Have an InterStellar Day! ~PrP
