When WILL I see YOU again?? <3
J/5_3: Was yesterday everything you were expecting?
Thank you for reading today's post. Have an InterStellar Day! ~PrP
Welcome to The Avenue
Please be respectful of your interactions with others here. Threats will not be tolerated.
To Re-Open Comments on a Past Post
This blog is set up for comments allowed only on the latest post. If you wish me to re-open a prior post so you can continue the discussion, use the language below. In this case, we are using the example of a past post that was entitled “The Social Dilemma“:
PrP r/o (and name of post you want reopened)
PrP r/o The Social Dilemma
I would then re-open the post and comments on the post “The Social Dilemma.”
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Petre on hope you found it
- Maurice on hope you found it
- Lin on hope you found it
- B yes thank you thank you on hope you found it
- I[7 on hope you found it
- Ap on hope you found it
- J[9 on hope you found it
- J[9 on hope you found it
- Helen on hope you found it
The argument concerning human theory and alien conjecture can not be solved by subjective argument. Therefore mathematical ideas that are suspected to be true but have yet to be proven in all circumstances can be either “Conjecture,” or “Theory.”
The fact that humans use machine-learning algorithms to generate such theoretical ideas in mathematics should not eliminate them from having their theories being considered Conjectures on our level. Although I will agree that humans will not be able to make significant new discoveries in pure mathematics using just machine learning. We can help them by introducing to one of our techniques that work well with their AI. They can combine their machine learning which is very good at finding patterns using invariants with AI abilities to identify new geometric measurements. The types of invariants they discover can open up new theorizing in their mathematics.
We could benefit from any discoveries that relate to the multidimensional problems we are facing.
We disagree with the idea of helping humans tackle pure mathematics. The idea that their primitive brains can understand the polynomial is absurd. They will never be able to understand the combinatorial invariance conjecture.
We need to rely on our own scientists to discover how the multidimensional map each other. If they can mathematically discover what features on a multidimensional map can be used to make predictions about where the next opening will occur, we can work to close those doors before they become a danger to us. Just because we don’t have immediate practical applications for these pure math conjectures doesn’t mean we should aid the unpredictable violent human in using more of their brain material because some of us believe they could aid us in some way.
Emotional beings have a bias when it comes to losses versus gains. They experience the pain of loss more intensely than they feel the pleasure of gain. They tend to make decisions that play it safe with the resources that they already have. Usually the manifests as risk aversion, but it can also motivate them to act when something is going to be taken away from them.
Sometimes they think that we are just as emotional as they are, but we just refuse to acknowledge it. They fail to see that we experience the pleasure of gain and loss equally. We have no basis. There are many who experience pleasure of gain more than they experience the pleasure of loss, in intelligent beings we tag them sociopaths.
There are many more similarities between us and humans than most will admit. We, like humans value things that are scarce or unique. The difference is our unique ability to Objectively consider how much the scarce or unique thing is worth to us against how much we would have to work to get it and what it would cost us to get it.
That doesn’t make us superior, it just makes us lucky to be higher on the evolutional latter.
I disagree we are superior to the human creature. Humans like are subject to operant conditioning. They can easily be conditioned to behave a certain way by associating a specific behavior with a reward.
I agree, we have had very much success dealing with leaders of nations on earth by randomizing how often the reward follows the action we want them to do. We find that it stimulates regular attempts of the behavior. For some leaders it leads to a compulsive need to please us.
Social Comparison is what happens in real life all the time for emotional beings. They spend their lives looking at other people around them to get an idea of well they are doing in comparison to those other people. If they see that most people aren’t doing as well as they are, they feel good about where they are. If they look at people around them and those people all seem to be doing better than they are they feel bad about themselves.
Emotional beings have a very difficult time putting their feelings of social inadequacy into context that would enable them to decide if it really matters. It is very difficult for them to ask themselves who they are trying to impress, much less whether those people they are trying to impress will pay any attention to them either way.
Social Comparison is a complicated topic, but in the context of earth nation manipulations, we have multiple applications of this. One way to trigger behavior related to social comparison is to offer viable technological advances to those nations willing to part with some of their humans for those technological gems.
How are your psychologically designed tricks any better than our use of force to gain the same benefit, if these human creature a little better than the cattle they eat, to us?
You would vote to disallow Our use of force to do what you do every day to solicit your ton of human meat. We will meet you and yours in the distance that ˇÓ´ ´Â∏´‰Ø‰ has deemed appropriate to relieve ÓˆÍ need to answer.
Wave your stick, we see no need to visit it
Keep in mind that while their “psychological designed tricks” are detrimental; they are not forcing their prey to do anything against their will. Your attempt to do so, may anger ˇÔ´ ´Â∏´‰Ø‰ regardless of the outcome of an engagement between you and your divergents.
N^3/11, why the insistence upon siding with the US against the coming conflict between them and Russia? The “whiteboy” in the US is just as corrupt. As for the stability of government in the US you cling to, with your claim they are the better nation, I submit that the country was almost taken over with the assistance of Lt. Gen. Charles Flynn willing to act on his brother’s behalf. I remind you that there were several Army, Navy, and Air Force Generals and Colonels willing to go along with the coup. None have been made to answer for their treacherous behavior. Hence, they are still there to continue building a Military that is poised for a coup.
But for a few non white military officers who made it clear they would resist to the fullest, militarily, the coup would have occurred. I also remind you that the Marine Corp was ready and anxious to give Trump and Flynn the reins. Their Air Corp was, and still is run by one of the staunches white nationalist in the US. Explain again where you see this stability in the US.
I will be voting to allow the battle to run its course and whoever wins, wins. I know that you are concerned that Putin feels this is the time to strike because he has all the US secret codes given to him by Trump and his Military minions, but those are the fortunes of war.
Even a porcupine needs some lovin’
The world’s richest 0.01 per cent saw their share of the $418 trillion global wealth hit 11 per cent this year, up about $420 billion from 10 per cent in 2020 due to the pandemic – all while 100 million people fell into extreme poverty.
The world’s richest group of 520,000 people saw a boost to their wealth during the pandemic and now own 11 per cent of the $418 trillion global wealth
The 2022 World Inequality Report found that a shift to an online economy during lockdowns and bets on the recovery greatly benefitted the rich
The concentration of wealth at the top came as 100 million fell into poverty
The report found that while half the world’s population only held 2 per cent of its wealth, the top 10 per cent held 76 per cent of global wealth
Forbes also listed a record-breaking 2,755 billionaires in 2021, with a combined worth of $13.1 trillion, up from $8 trillion last year